# open-wearables vs Rallly

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Rallly |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #1 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 5 330 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 ✓ | +61 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 29 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v4.16.3 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Rallly scores 69/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

Rallly ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for open-wearables.

If you want the quickest setup, Rallly is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+173 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Rallly](https://selfhost.directory/project/rallly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rallly.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-rallly