open-wearablesvsRainbond
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Rainbond | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #2 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 6 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v6.10.0-release · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Rainbond scores 64/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rainbond.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Rainbond details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Rainbond, compare it with