# open-wearables vs Qinglong

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Qinglong |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 20 023 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Qinglong scores 69/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.

If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Qinglong](https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-qinglong