# open-wearables vs pcp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | pcp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #36 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 727 ✓ | 1 079 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 ✓ | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | 7.2.2 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

open-wearables scores 63/100 against 62/100 for pcp, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for pcp.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [pcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/pcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pcp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-pcp