open-wearablesvspcp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | pcp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #36 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 727 | 1 079 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | 7.2.2 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 62/100 for pcp, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for pcp.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →pcp details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep pcp, compare it with