open-wearablesvspaymenter
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | paymenter | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 2 811 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +500 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 14 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.5.9 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
paymenter scores 68/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for paymenter.
paymenter is growing faster right now (+500 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →paymenter details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep paymenter, compare it with