open-wearablesvsPanWatch
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | PanWatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 2 272 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +121 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 12 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for PanWatch.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
open-wearables details →PanWatch details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep PanWatch, compare it with