# Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 8 179 | 8 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 | +153 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) scores 71/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-routing-machine-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-routing-machine-osrm.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-source-routing-machine-osrm-vs-workout-cool