# Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 8 179 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) scores 71/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-routing-machine-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-routing-machine-osrm.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-source-routing-machine-osrm-vs-windows-arm