# Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) vs restic-rest-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | restic-rest-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 8 178 ✓ | 1 531 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | C++ | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) scores 71/100 against 60/100 for restic-rest-server, so it is the safer default.

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for restic-rest-server.

If you want the quickest setup, restic-rest-server is easier to run; Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) needs more configuration.

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-routing-machine-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-routing-machine-osrm.md)
- [restic-rest-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/restic-rest-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/restic-rest-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-source-routing-machine-osrm-vs-restic-rest-server