# Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) vs OpenTripPlanner

> Two self-hosted [Navigation projects](https://selfhost.directory/navigation), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | OpenTripPlanner |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #4 of 7 in Navigation |
| GitHub stars | 8 177 ✓ | 2 766 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 ✓ | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.10.0 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) scores 71/100 against 64/100 for OpenTripPlanner, so it is the safer default.

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenTripPlanner.

If you want the quickest setup, Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is easier to run; OpenTripPlanner needs more configuration.

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-routing-machine-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-routing-machine-osrm.md)
- [OpenTripPlanner](https://selfhost.directory/project/opentripplanner) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opentripplanner.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-source-routing-machine-osrm-vs-opentripplanner