# Open Source POS vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Source POS | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Commerce | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 4 468 | 6 050 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +98 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.4.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 66/100 for Open Source POS, so it is the safer default.

Open Source POS ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Open Source POS is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Open Source POS](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-pos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-pos.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-source-pos-vs-zammad