# Open Responses vs Qwen Gate

> Two self-hosted [OpenAI API alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/openai-api), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Responses | Qwen Gate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 46/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #95 of 125 in AI | #70 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 236 ✓ | 206 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.8.0 · 25 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Qwen Gate scores 46/100 against 42/100 for Open Responses, so it is the safer default.

Qwen Gate ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Open Responses.

## Details

- [Open Responses](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-responses) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-responses.md)
- [Qwen Gate](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwengate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwengate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-responses-vs-qwengate