Open ResponsesvsQwen Gate
Two self-hosted OpenAI API alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Responses | Qwen Gate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #95 of 125 in AI | #70 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 236 | 206 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v0.8.0 · 25 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Qwen Gate scores 46/100 against 42/100 for Open Responses, so it is the safer default.
Qwen Gate ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Open Responses.
Open Responses details →Qwen Gate details → All OpenAI API alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Open Responses, compare it with
Keep Qwen Gate, compare it with