# open-notebook vs SourceWeft

> Two self-hosted [NotebookLM alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/notebooklm), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-notebook | SourceWeft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #52 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 40 681 ✓ | 335 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 247 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 4 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

open-notebook scores 80/100 against 48/100 for SourceWeft, so it is the safer default.

open-notebook ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SourceWeft.

If you want the quickest setup, open-notebook is easier to run; SourceWeft needs more configuration.

open-notebook is growing faster right now (+1 247 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-notebook](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-notebook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-notebook.md)
- [SourceWeft](https://selfhost.directory/project/sourceweft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sourceweft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-notebook-vs-sourceweft