# open·kritt vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open·kritt | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 78 in Security | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 379 | 6 519 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.

open·kritt ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.

If you want the quickest setup, open·kritt is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

Zabbix is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-kritt-vs-zabbix