# open·kritt vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open·kritt | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 78 in Security | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 2 379 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

open·kritt scores 62/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

open·kritt ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; open·kritt needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-kritt-vs-wbo