# open·kritt vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open·kritt | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 78 in Security | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 383 | 13 313 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +303 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; open·kritt needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-kritt-vs-stash