# open·kritt vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open·kritt | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 78 in Security | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 2 380 | 35 801 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +840 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-kritt-vs-seaweedfs