# open·kritt vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open·kritt | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 78 in Security | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 384 ✓ | 1 034 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +64 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.

If you want the quickest setup, open·kritt is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-kritt-vs-readmeabook