# open·kritt vs Owncast

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open·kritt | Owncast |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 78 in Security | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 384 | 11 632 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +76 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Owncast scores 73/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.

open·kritt ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.

If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; open·kritt needs more configuration.

Owncast is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)
- [Owncast](https://selfhost.directory/project/owncast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/owncast.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-kritt-vs-owncast