# open·kritt vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open·kritt | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 78 in Security | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 379 | 393 300 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 952 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 952 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-kritt-vs-openclaw