# Open Food Network vs Typebot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Food Network | Typebot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 1 301 | 10 587 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +223 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v5.8.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Typebot scores 70/100 against 62/100 for Open Food Network, so it is the safer default.

Open Food Network ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Typebot.

If you want the quickest setup, Typebot is easier to run; Open Food Network needs more configuration.

Typebot is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Food Network](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-food-network) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-food-network.md)
- [Typebot](https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-food-network-vs-typebot