Open Food NetworkvsTypebot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Food Network | Typebot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 1 301 | 10 587 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +223 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 8 |
| Latest release | v5.8.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Typebot scores 70/100 against 62/100 for Open Food Network, so it is the safer default.
Open Food Network ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Typebot.
If you want the quickest setup, Typebot is easier to run; Open Food Network needs more configuration.
Typebot is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).
Open Food Network details →Typebot details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Food Network, compare it with
Keep Typebot, compare it with