# Open Food Network vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Food Network | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 1 301 | 15 376 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +44 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v5.8.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 62/100 for Open Food Network, so it is the safer default.

Open Food Network ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Food Network](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-food-network) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-food-network.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-food-network-vs-peertube