Open Food NetworkvsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Food Network | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 1 301 | 15 376 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +44 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 13 |
| Latest release | v5.8.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 62/100 for Open Food Network, so it is the safer default.
Open Food Network ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.
PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
Open Food Network details →PeerTube details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Food Network, compare it with
Keep PeerTube, compare it with