# OpenDesign vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenDesign | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Design | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 104 814 ✓ | 24 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 983 ✓ | +785 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | open-design-v0.26.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenDesign scores 83/100 against 82/100 for temporal, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenDesign.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenDesign is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

OpenDesign is growing faster right now (+1 983 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenDesign](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-design) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-design.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-temporal