# open-compute vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-compute | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Serverless | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 369 | 89 717 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 55/100 for open-compute, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for open-compute.

If you want the quickest setup, open-compute is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-compute](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-compute-vs-world-monitor