# open-compute vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-compute | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Serverless | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 380 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 55/100 for open-compute, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for open-compute.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-compute](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-compute-vs-openreader