# Open Codex vs Unison

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Codex | Unison |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in CLI Tools | #2 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 695 | 5 559 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | OCaml |

## Which one should you pick?

Unison scores 65/100 against 45/100 for Open Codex, so it is the safer default.

Unison ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Open Codex.

If you want the quickest setup, Open Codex is easier to run; Unison needs more configuration.

Unison is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Codex](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-codex) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-codex.md)
- [Unison](https://selfhost.directory/project/unison) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unison.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-codex-vs-unison