# Open Codex vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Codex | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in CLI Tools | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 695 | 56 868 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +139 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 45/100 for Open Codex, so it is the safer default.

Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Open Codex.

Typst is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Codex](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-codex) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-codex.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-codex-vs-typst