ontimevsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ontime | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 1 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.
ontime ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; ontime needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
ontime details →Workout.cool details →