# ontime vs Typebot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ontime | Typebot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 10 587 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +223 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Typebot scores 70/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.

ontime ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Typebot.

Typebot is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)
- [Typebot](https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ontime-vs-typebot