# ontime vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ontime | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 16 647 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +260 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for ontime.

If you want the quickest setup, ontime is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

trigger is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ontime-vs-trigger