ontimevsSparkyFitness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ontime | SparkyFitness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 6 502 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 27 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
SparkyFitness scores 66/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for ontime.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+391 stars in 30 days).
ontime details →SparkyFitness details →