# ontime vs Forem Selfhost

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ontime | Forem Selfhost |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #2 of 6 in Community |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 1 480 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Jinja |

## Which one should you pick?

ontime scores 60/100 against 51/100 for Forem Selfhost, so it is the safer default.

ontime ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Forem Selfhost.

If you want the quickest setup, ontime is easier to run; Forem Selfhost needs more configuration.

ontime is growing faster right now (+13 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)
- [Forem Selfhost](https://selfhost.directory/project/selfhost) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/selfhost.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ontime-vs-selfhost