# ontime vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ontime | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 45 023 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +1 622 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for ontime.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ontime-vs-reactive-resume