# ontime vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ontime | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 970 | 35 309 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +506 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.

ontime ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+506 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ontime-vs-qdrant