# ontime vs PixelFed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ontime | PixelFed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #12 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 7 131 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +24 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

PixelFed scores 64/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.

ontime ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for PixelFed.

If you want the quickest setup, ontime is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.

## Details

- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)
- [PixelFed](https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pixelfed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ontime-vs-pixelfed