ontimevsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ontime | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 15 375 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 13 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.
ontime ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.
If you want the quickest setup, ontime is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
PeerTube is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
ontime details →PeerTube details →