ontimevsOSEM
Two self-hosted Event Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ontime | OSEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #8 of 11 in Event Management |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 929 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
ontime scores 60/100 against 47/100 for OSEM, so it is the safer default.
ontime ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OSEM.
If you want the quickest setup, ontime is easier to run; OSEM needs more configuration.
ontime is growing faster right now (+13 stars in 30 days).
ontime details →OSEM details →All Event Management projects →