# ontime vs OpenSlides

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ontime | OpenSlides |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #3 of 3 in Conference Management |
| GitHub stars | 969 ✓ | 660 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +15 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.3.6 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

ontime scores 60/100 against 56/100 for OpenSlides, so it is the safer default.

ontime ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for OpenSlides.

If you want the quickest setup, ontime is easier to run; OpenSlides needs more configuration.

## Details

- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)
- [OpenSlides](https://selfhost.directory/project/openslides) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openslides.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ontime-vs-openslides