# ontime vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ontime | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 393 322 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +2 898 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for ontime.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 898 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ontime-vs-openclaw