Onlookvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Onlook | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Web Development | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 27 040 | 17 958 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +68 | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 29 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 69/100 for Onlook, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Onlook.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Onlook needs more configuration.
Onlook details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep Onlook, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with