OnlookvsSyslog-ng
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Onlook | Syslog-ng | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Web Development | #3 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 27 038 | 2 386 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Onlook scores 69/100 against 66/100 for Syslog-ng, so it is the safer default.
Syslog-ng ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Onlook.
If you want the quickest setup, Syslog-ng is easier to run; Onlook needs more configuration.
Onlook is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
Onlook details →Syslog-ng details →
Swap a project
Keep Onlook, compare it with
Keep Syslog-ng, compare it with