OnlookvsResume-Matcher
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Onlook | Resume-Matcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Web Development | #1 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 27 033 | 28 922 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +61 | +408 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 69/100 for Onlook, so it is the safer default.
Resume-Matcher ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Onlook.
If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; Onlook needs more configuration.
Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+408 stars in 30 days).
Onlook details →Resume-Matcher details →
Swap a project
Keep Onlook, compare it with
Keep Resume-Matcher, compare it with