# Onlook vs PhotoPrism

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Onlook | PhotoPrism |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Web Development | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 27 028 | 40 373 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 | +138 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 69/100 for Onlook, so it is the safer default.

PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Onlook.

If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; Onlook needs more configuration.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Onlook](https://selfhost.directory/project/onlook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/onlook.md)
- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/onlook-vs-photoprism