# Onetime Secret vs scrt.link

> Two self-hosted [PrivateBin alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/privatebin), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Onetime Secret | scrt.link |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Secrets Management | #24 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 2 978 ✓ | 79 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.26.19 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Onetime Secret scores 61/100 against 43/100 for scrt.link, so it is the safer default.

Onetime Secret ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for scrt.link.

If you want the quickest setup, Onetime Secret is easier to run; scrt.link needs more configuration.

Onetime Secret is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Onetime Secret](https://selfhost.directory/project/onetime-secret) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/onetime-secret.md)
- [scrt.link](https://selfhost.directory/project/scrtlink) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scrtlink.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/onetime-secret-vs-scrtlink