# oncodash vs OpenScribe

> Two self-hosted [Healthcare projects](https://selfhost.directory/healthcare), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | oncodash | OpenScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 28/100 | 44/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Healthcare | #4 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 16 | 223 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Vue | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenScribe scores 44/100 against 28/100 for oncodash, so it is the safer default.

OpenScribe ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for oncodash.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenScribe is easier to run; oncodash needs more configuration.

## Details

- [oncodash](https://selfhost.directory/project/oncodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/oncodash.md)
- [OpenScribe](https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/oncodash-vs-openscribe