# Omoide vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Omoide | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #37 of 41 in Photo Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 277 | 47 727 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +20 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.7.6 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 40/100 for Omoide, so it is the safer default.

Omoide ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Omoide needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Omoide](https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omoide-vs-text-generation-webui